The location is moved from Africa to Siberia and Leo's first love interest becomes an American woman. These are among the many deviations from the source material in the 1935 version of She. Many of the changes were due to the Hays Code, which had begun to be strictly enforced the previous year. All the changes diminish the film either by degrading the quality of the story or introducing racist elements. But this movie has some impressive special effects and Randolph Scott is pretty good as Leo.
This is the only version I've seen so far that treats "She" as a proper name. People say things like, "That was She's idea." It sounds really awkward. I don't think the name "Ayesha" is even mentioned.
Altogether, it seems a misbegotten film. It was directed by Merian C. Cooper, who made King Kong, and he reused some props and sets from his more famous film because he was forced to work on a reduced budget for She. According to Wikipedia, Cooper considered She to be the worst movie he ever made.
One might assume moving the location from Africa to Siberia was to avoid the imperialist trope of a savage African tribe being ruled by a white person. But it was in fact racism that motivated the change, not Cooper's or Universal's but the Hays Code's, which forbade depictions of miscegenation. The Wikipedia entry says that that the book depicts a white man marrying a black woman but that's actually not true. The woman, Ustane, is a member of the Amahagger people whom Ayesha rules. Haggard describes the people as having yellowish skin and aquiline features. People of colour, maybe, but not black. In other adaptations, including the ones previous to the 1935 version, they're generally white, as indeed they are in the 1935 version. But Ustane's replacement, an American girl named Tanya played by the scrumptious but vacant Helen Mack, doesn't even marry Leo in this version.
Mack is in fact prettier than the woman who plays She, Helen Gahagan, though Gahagan is beautiful. But another effect of the Hays Code was that the title character of the story was no longer permitted to be in any way ambiguous; she must very clearly be a villain every second, so even the dumbest guy in the back row won't get the wrong idea. She's cruel, and the interesting dialogue she has in the book about the difficult decisions she has to make as ruler when administering justice is reduced to a cock-eyed speech in which she explains she must rule with terror. When she goes into the flame at the end, she does so while continuously heaping insults on Tanya. In addition to this, the Hays Code meant that Gahagan didn't get anything like Betty Blythe's see-through clothes or jewel bikini. Her black silk coif with a crown was used as inspiration for the evil queen in Disney's Snow White. In any case, it's understandable that Leo and Holly aren't haunted by the memory of her beauty in this version, especially not Leo, with Tanya clinging to him.
Holly is played by Nigel Bruce, best known for playing Watson to Basil Rathbone's Sherlock Holmes. His version of Holly, like his Watson, is played for broad comedy. So much for the tragic, hirsute professor from the book.
The movie has some good matte paintings and Max Steiner's score is good. In contrast to the director's feelings about the film, Steiner evidently considered this the best score of his long career. There's also a surprising, randomly well choreographed dance sequence near the end. Something about the fact that it's so well choreographed makes it incredibly silly. I couldn't help laughing.