I started reading Pauline Kael's I Lost It at the Movies last week, a collection of her reviews and essays from 1954 to 1965. It's giving me a lot of perspective. Most books I've read from that period, books that commentated on contemporary life, had a mostly progressive or liberal perspective while Kael seems to have been much more conservative. Although she praises Marlon Brando and The Wild One, Streetcar Named Desire, and On the Waterfront, she nonetheless decries a general trend of "delinquent" cinema.
The romance of human desperation is ravishing for those who wish to identify with the hero's amoral victory: everything he does is forgivable, his crimes are not crimes at all, because he is so terribly misunderstood. (And who in the audience, what creature that ever lived, felt he was loved enough?) This is the victory that we used to think of as a child's fantasy: now it is morality for nursery school and theater alike.
I wonder what she'd have thought of Joker.
More amusing, and slightly embarrassing, are her comments on how women were increasingly being portrayed, arguing a "Calendar Girl" aesthetic was infiltrating art-house cinema.
This female image is a parody of woman--lascivious face, wet open mouth, gigantic drooping breasts. She has no character, no individuality: she's blonde or brunette or redhead, as one might consume a martini, an old-fashioned, or a gin and tonic.
Now I am told that even the junior-high-school boys of America use photographs like these as pinups, and that this is their idea of the desirable female. I don't believe it. I would guess that they pretend to this ideal because they're afraid they won't be considered manly and sexy if they admit they find this image disgusting.
No, Pauline, they really thought these pinup girls were beautiful, I can guarantee it. And boys feeling disgust? I wonder if she thought bug collecting and the scatological humour of 14 year old boys were but poses. If she wanted boys to be disgusted by images of women, she should have shown them pictures of matrons serving broccoli and asparagus.
I recently reread Laura Mulvey's essay "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema", the essay that introduced the term "male gaze" along with Gaze Theory. I was struck again by what an overrated essay it is, and certainly the concept of "male gaze" is no original thought. Even Pauline Kael, writing fifteen or twenty years earlier, wouldn't have been the first to comment on women in media being depicted so as to gratify male lust. I suppose one key difference between Kael and Mulvey is that Mulvey implies the impulse to degrade women is a genetic trait carried by all men while Kael felt it was societal conditioning. Which makes Mulvey sound like the right-winger and Kael the left-winger.
I would agree that women are portrayed degradingly in a lot of media. I would say men are, too, for the satisfaction of women, though less prevalently. The suffering delinquents in the movies Kael talks about would be an example as would, I'd say, the male figures in the Twilight series. Heterosexual men and women want to see the opposite sex degraded. It gives the viewer a sense of superiority, yes, but I think very often that sense is sought for an impression of safety. When the handsome, wounded boy looks up at his beautiful saviour, she doesn't have to worry about him deceiving her into going to bed with him. That mysterious creature on the other side of daily existence suddenly becomes a known quantity, that attractive shape suddenly becomes more easily obtainable.








For as much as people decry the slightest signs of inappropriate sexual imagery, millions of those same people still happily indulge in rape fantasies. It's a very different thing from true rape, existing in a fantasy world wherein stimulating surprise and loss of control are carefully arranged in a perfect cocktail of titillation, the sort of thing that doesn't tend to happen by accident. A great example is 1973's
The artwork is fantastic. The film clearly had a very low budget, even for '70s anime, and many scenes are simply still images with audio only dialogue. But the animators are strategically deployed for some of the most fascinatingly crafted abstractions of orgasm I've ever seen.
When Jeanne (Aiko Nagayama) is first taken to the castle and gang raped by the lord (Masaya Takahashi) and his court, we see her whole body seemingly split down the centre to turn into bright red bats that flutter away.
When she decides to give herself to the Devil (none other than Tatsuya Nakadai!), we see her wrap her legs around the giant, throbbing red man with a distinctive cap.
So she becomes a witch and incites the whole town to uncontrolled lust. This is visually represented by a vast, pulsating ring of hair created by that of all the women in the town, and tangled in the hair are the townspeople, phasing in and out of animal forms as they undulate in pairs or with objects.
The incidents that form Jeanne's misfortunes become increasingly unlikely. First she's an innocent maiden who falls prey to primae nocta, then she inexplicably becomes a money lender. She's wealthy and hated but for some reason doesn't think to hire bodyguards so she's unprepared when the townsfolk tear all her clothes off.
Despite the fact that this fascinating, full length dream sequence seems to present its impression of violence entirely to titillate, it ends with a random statement about how Jeanne's sacrifice somehow led to the French Revolution. Considering some of the political events of the past seven years in America, I do wonder if some people take fantasies like this very, very seriously. But fortunately it doesn't distract me from appreciating brilliant artistry.
Belladonna of Sadness is available on The Criterion Channel.
Twitter Sonnet #1461
Important turtles dwell beneath the down.
Entire doors were dashed for dizzy wrath.
Elected clubs beheld the sequined gown.
Relentless hands create the songless path.
Dessert was second string to sweets to-night.
Delicious cake was cheese or choc'late loaf.
Arranging grains of sugar makes it right.
When choosing single cards just gather both.
Replacing Zs with S condemns surprise.
Resourceful circles turn around apace.
Revealing masks reject the name "disguise".
Reporting deems the heart a dry disgrace.
To-morrow strolls along the crooked street.
To touch the wall's to feel a heavy beat.




























