Here's a hazardous question that can often
be asked and answered glibly; what does the female fan want? According to this
interview Steven Moffat, co-creator and best writer for the Sherlock
Holmes pastiche television series Sherlock, women want
Sherlock Holmes.
. . . it's got such a huge female
following. The original stories had a huge female following, which I'd never
forgotten, and that's because the Victorian ladies liked the way Sherlock
looked. (Laughs.) So I thought, use this massively exciting,
rather handsome man who could see right through your heart and have no interest
. . . of course, he's going to be a sex god! I think we pitched that character
right. I think our female fanbase all believe that they'll be the one to melt
that glacier. They're all wrong, nothing will melt that glacier.
I wonder if this influenced his decision to
set the second episode of the new season around the marriage of John Watson and
Mary Morstan. Morstan appears in the Holmes novel The Sign of
Four. The book depicts Watson's proposal to her but, although he
marries her and The Sign of Four is only the second Holmes
story and therefore followed by the bulk of the series, Mary essentially never
appears again though Watson does refer to his wife now and then and is married.
Mary eventually dies and her death isn't even directly mentioned, only vaguely
alluded to when Holmes expresses condolences to Watson in The Empty
House. The marriage is so inconspicuous in the stories that
adaptations frequently omit the existence of Watson's wife entirely.
In Sherlock, Mary isn't
only a full fledged character we see her outwit both John
and Sherlock to get them to go play outside together (go on
a case) to reaffirm their friendship despite John's upcoming marriage.
Holmes' reluctance to engage in society for
the sake of normal human companionship in the stories was portrayed as
something of a dysfunction in the Jeremy Brett series but in the new show it's
shown as something that renders Sherlock, as he himself observes with smiling
self-deprecation, a "baby". In the stories and the Brett series,
Holmes and Watson could have fun together. They would go to the symphony
together. Although Sherlock in the new show plays the violin, the two men never
seem to share a laugh. Even their night of drunken revelry shows the two being
oddly solemn--Sherlock using beakers for beer in order to make some sort of
precise calculation regarding alcohol and body weight while John is the quietly
incredulous foil. Both seem a little too high strung for their own good. This
sort of thing seems to have been created to give the female characters, like
the bridesmaid introduced in the episode, Mrs. Hudson, Molly the coroner, and
Mary something to feel maternal and vaguely pitying towards Sherlock about.
But, as Moffat observed, women were already
fans of Sherlock Holmes. Do we really need this false equivalency? Well, the
episode is fun and really cute. The murder mystery makes no sense--it relies on
people not noticing being fatally stabbed and a survivor of such a stabbing
being unable to provide any information about it afterwards. But it was a cute
and fluffy show. That may not be what one goes to Sherlock Holmes looking for,
but if one takes it out of context it's a bit of harmless fun.
Still, my favourite episode of the series
so far has been "A Scandal in Belgravia".
Rather than dumbing Holmes and Watson down for the supposed benefit of female
characters meant to be average, "A Scandal in Belgravia"
has an extraordinary woman for Sherlock to match wits with. Of course, Irene
Adler can't be around all the time--she only appeared in one of the original
stories. But the fact that she's as clever as Holmes isn't the reason for her
only appearing once, I would say. I think it has more to do with the fact that
the stories were about Sherlock Holmes.
Perhaps someone ought to make another
series about a brilliant female detective. Oh, I am looking forward to the
Veronica Mars movie.
No comments:
Post a Comment